<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sphere and the Look Of Web 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jachbla.wordpress.com/2006/05/09/sphere-and-the-look-of-web-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jachbla.wordpress.com/2006/05/09/sphere-and-the-look-of-web-20/</link>
	<description>thoughts on Web 2.0, design, technology and other miscellanea</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:50:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 7daysandmore&#187; Blog Archive &#187; Designing a Web 2.0 interface</title>
		<link>http://jachbla.wordpress.com/2006/05/09/sphere-and-the-look-of-web-20/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>7daysandmore&#187; Blog Archive &#187; Designing a Web 2.0 interface</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 07:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://jachbla.wordpress.com/2006/05/09/sphere-and-the-look-of-web-20/#comment-36</guid>
		<description>[...] two.point on how should a &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; app look: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] two.point on how should a &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; app look: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: centrestage &#187; Designing a Web 2.0 Interface</title>
		<link>http://jachbla.wordpress.com/2006/05/09/sphere-and-the-look-of-web-20/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>centrestage &#187; Designing a Web 2.0 Interface</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 11:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://jachbla.wordpress.com/2006/05/09/sphere-and-the-look-of-web-20/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>[...] two.point on how should a &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; app look: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] two.point on how should a &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; app look: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jachbla</title>
		<link>http://jachbla.wordpress.com/2006/05/09/sphere-and-the-look-of-web-20/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>jachbla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 13:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://jachbla.wordpress.com/2006/05/09/sphere-and-the-look-of-web-20/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Technorati has had quite a head start, but I think it&#039;s a case of apples vs. oranges. True, both are by definition primarily blog search engines, but Technorati seems to cram so much in that it can seem kind of overwhelming sometimes, especially on the first visit. We&#039;ll have to see if Sphere can sustain itself once the initial buzz wears off and it&#039;ll be interesting to see what directions they might take in the future.

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technorati has had quite a head start, but I think it&#8217;s a case of apples vs. oranges. True, both are by definition primarily blog search engines, but Technorati seems to cram so much in that it can seem kind of overwhelming sometimes, especially on the first visit. We&#8217;ll have to see if Sphere can sustain itself once the initial buzz wears off and it&#8217;ll be interesting to see what directions they might take in the future.</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Harwood</title>
		<link>http://jachbla.wordpress.com/2006/05/09/sphere-and-the-look-of-web-20/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Harwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 12:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://jachbla.wordpress.com/2006/05/09/sphere-and-the-look-of-web-20/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>While I agree the design is almost spot-on, I do find it vastly inferior to technorati in many respects. Maybe I need to check it out more, but I find it quite lacking in features - but that is possibly because I&#039;ve become very used to technorati. 

Keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree the design is almost spot-on, I do find it vastly inferior to technorati in many respects. Maybe I need to check it out more, but I find it quite lacking in features &#8211; but that is possibly because I&#8217;ve become very used to technorati. </p>
<p>Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
